
Photo Radar Defenses

My speedometer was broken. Is this a defense to my photo radar violation?
No, as with any traffic violation, equipment malfunction is not a defense. See Boulder Revised Code section 7-2-7.
Back to top
Another driver near me was exhibiting signs of road rage, and I felt that the safest thing to do was to speed up and get away from the area. Can I get my case dismissed?
No, not unless the circumstances established a necessity defense. Besides, law enforcement officers and driving instructors uniformly recommend slowing down or turning off when you encounter such a driver. Speeding up is the worst reaction as it is likely to escalate the road rage.
Back to top
I was driving with the flow of traffic. Isn't this a defense?
No. While some driving manuals promote this practice, the law requires that the driver of a vehicle follow the posted speed limit.
Back to top
I was behind a large truck that blocked my view of the school zone light. Will the prosecutor dismiss my case?
The law requires that the driver of a vehicle drive in a manner that permits the vehicle to be operated in compliance with all applicable traffic laws. This includes driving behind a large truck, SUV, or bus at a sufficient distance to see traffic signals and signs.
Back to top
Doesn't "Photo Enforcement" violate my constitutional rights?
Automated vehicle identification systems ("photo enforcement systems") are authorized by both the State of Colorado (C.R.S. 42-4-110.5) and the City of Boulder (Boulder Revised Code section 7-4-74). Both laws have been upheld against constitutional challenges. Further, Boulder's photo enforcement program has always been operated in compliance with state law.
Back to top
Are there any valid defenses to a photo radar violation?
The only valid defense is the "Necessity" defense. See Boulder Revised Code section 7-2-6. This defense has multiple conditions that must be satisfied in order to be valid. If you think you have a Necessity defense, come to court on your scheduled court date to discuss it with the prosecutor.
Back to top
Last Updated on Friday, 29 June 2012 10:09